全部開發方案

X Subscription Plus

Cursorentry
$8
$7 年繳
最近核實: 2026-10-14
先撞到哪一條
廠商未公開數字
等效 API 價值
—
價值倍數
—
超額之後
top-ups buy Additional Usage credits, at API list price for third-party models
使用場景
僅限互動式使用

額度

廠商未公開數字

shared weekly usage pool, "Base", size not published

›廠商原文
The X Subscription price table gives Plus "$8/mo", "$80/yr ($7/mo)" with included usage "Base"; the cursor.com/pricing card calls it "Our introductory plan: Shared AI usage pool". The higher tiers are sized as multiples of it ("4x more usage compared to Plus"), and no figure is published for the base itself.
開啟來源頁

包含的模型

模型能力檔消耗係數
Grok 4.7未劃檔—
Grok 4.6未劃檔—
Grok 4.5frontier—

訂閱 vs 自己掛 API key

這裡比的是同一種用法的兩條路——在 IDE 或 CLI 裡,BYOK 工具讓直連 API 是真實可選項。它不是在說訂閱整體比 API 便宜。

模型池內實際單價 / 100 萬 token相對 API 單價回本點
Grok 4.7未劃檔——5.3M
Grok 4.6未劃檔——5.3M
Grok 4.5frontier——5.3M

使用條款

引自廠商條款原文。我們不提供法律建議。

The X Subscription Consumer Terms of Service cover "Grok, Grokipedia, Grok Bot, Cursor, and other services" and contain no clause authorizing programmatic access to the subscription; API use is governed elsewhere: "Our Enterprise Terms of Service govern the use of our Services for developers and businesses, for example SpaceXSI APIs and PromptIDE." The nearest restrictions are "(iii) rent, lease, lend, or sell the Service" and "(viii) harvest, scrape, or extract data from the Service". The Grok API access included from Plus up does not draw on the plan: "API usage is billed separately at standard model rates and doesn't draw from your plan's usage pool." Read as: the terms do not explicitly authorize it.

變更紀錄

  1. 2026-10-14來自冷啟動資料